RESUMO A amiloidose cardíaca é uma doença infiltrativa que exige um alto grau de suspeição clínica para o diagnóstico apropriado. O diagnóstico precoce e a definição do subtipo de amiloidose têm um papel fundamental para a terapêutica e prognóstico desta doença. Nesse contexto, o emprego de biomarcadores cardíacos como as troponinas e NT-proBNT associados à análise por métodos de imagem multimodalidade por técnicas ecocardiográficas atuais como o strain, medicina nuclear e a ressonância magnética cardíaca têm papel crescente em pacientes com amiloidose. Este artigo detalha a utilização dos métodos não invasivos para a avaliação de pacientes com amiloidose cardíaca.

SUMMARY Cardiac amyloidosis is an infiltrative disease which requires a high degree of clinical suspicion for appropriate diagnosis. Early diagnosis and the definition of the type of amyloidosis play a key role in the early treatment and prognosis of this disease. In this context, the use of cardiac biomarkers such as troponins and NT-proBNT associated with analysis by multimodality imaging methods like echocardiographic techniques such as strain, nuclear medicine, and cardiovascular resonance imaging have an increasing role in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. This article details the role of non-invasive diagnostic methods in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

Resumo Fundamentos: Testes funcionais possuem limitada acurácia para identificar isquemia miocárdica em pacientes com bloqueio de ramo esquerdo (BRE). Objetivo: Utilizando tomógrafo com 320 detectores foi avaliado a acurácia diagnóstica da perfusão miocárdica de estresse com dipiridamol pela tomografia (PMT) em pacientes com BRE utilizando a angiografia coronária quantitativa invasiva (QCA) (estenose ≥ 70%) como referência. Procurou-se também investigar o valor adicional da PMT sobre a angiotomografia coronariana (ATC) comparando a acurácia com a cintilografia perfusional miocárdica (SPECT). Métodos: Trinta pacientes com BRE e SPECT prévio em investigação de doença arterial coronariana foram encaminhados para realização do protocolo de estresse na tomografia. Observadores independentes realizaram avaliação por paciente e por território coronariano. Todos os pacientes assinaram um termo de consentimento livre e esclarecido aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética da Instituição. Resultados: A média de idade foi 62 ± 10 anos. A dose média de radiação do protocolo de tomografia foi 9,3 ± 4,6 mSv. Em relação a PMT, na análise por paciente, a sensibilidade, especificidade, valores preditivos positivos e negativos e acurácia foram, respectivamente, 86%, 81%, 80%, 87%, 83% p = 0,001. Na análise por território os valores foram, respectivamente, 63%, 86% a 65%, 84%, 79% p < 0,001. Em ambas as análises, a adição da PMT a ATC determinou maior acurácia diagnóstica para detecção de isquemia miocárdica quando comparado com o SPECT (p < 0,001). Conclusão: O uso do protocolo de estresse na tomografia é viável e tem boa acurácia diagnóstica na pesquisa de isquemia miocárdica nos pacientes com BRE.

Abstract Background: Functional tests have limited accuracy for identifying myocardial ischemia in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole-stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) by 320-detector CT in patients with LBBB using invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) (stenosis ≥ 70%) as reference; to investigate the advantage of adding CTP to coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and compare the results with those of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods: Thirty patients with LBBB who had undergone SPECT for the investigation of coronary artery disease were referred for stress tomography. Independent examiners performed per-patient and per-coronary territory assessments. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study that was approved by the institution’s ethics committee. Results: The patients’ mean age was 62 ± 10 years. The mean dose of radiation for the tomography protocol was 9.3 ± 4.6 mSv. With regard to CTP, the per-patient values for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 86%, 81%, 80%, 87%, and 83%, respectively (p = 0.001). The per-territory values were 63%, 86%, 65%, 84%, and 79%, respectively (p < 0.001). In both analyses, the addition of CTP to CTA achieved higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting myocardial ischemia than SPECT (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of the stress tomography protocol is feasible and has good diagnostic accuracy for assessing myocardial ischemia in patients with LBBB.

OBJECTIVES: Perfusion abnormalities are frequently seen in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) when a left bundle branch block is present. A few studies have shown decreased coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending territory, regardless of the presence of coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography imaging in the assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with left bundle branch block (GI), median age 63.5 years, 22 (58%) female, 12 with coronary artery disease (≥70%; GI-A) and 26 with no evidence of significant coronary artery disease (GI-B), underwent rest-dipyridamole stress 82Rb-positron emission tomography with absolute quantitative flow measurements using Cedars-Sinai software (mL/min/g). The relative myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed in 17 segments. These parameters were compared with those obtained from 30 patients with normal 82Rb-positron emission tomography studies and without left bundle branch block (GII). RESULTS: Stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve were significantly lower in GI than in GII (p<0.05). The comparison of coronary flow reserve between GI-A and GI-B showed that it was different from the global coronary flow reserve (p<0.05) and the stress flow was significantly lower in the anterior than in the septal wall for both groups. Perfusion abnormalities were more prevalent in GI-A (p=0.06) and the left ventricular ejection fraction was not different between GI-A and GI-B, whereas it was lower in GI than in GII (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The data confirm that patients with left bundle branch block had decreased myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve and coronary flow reserve assessed by 82Rb-positron emission tomography imaging may be useful in identifying coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.